.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Monday, September 29, 2008

 
TWO STUPID WASTES OF LIMITED RESOURCES

On September 10, 2008, ABC News reported in $54 Million 'Pants' Lawsuit Headed Back to Court:

The multi-million-dollar legal battle over a pair of missing pants that put a D.C. dry cleaner out of business is headed back to court, shocking many in the dry-cleaning and legal communities.

A three-judge appellate court panel has agreed to hear an appeal of the case next month, more than a year after a judge ruled against the plaintiff, former D.C. Administrative Law Judge Roy Pearson.

Pearson sued the owners of Custom Cleaners for $67 million in 2005 after it misplaced a pair of his pants. Pearson demanded the family pay $1,000, the cost of the entire suit, according to Pearson. The family refused initially, but eventually offered him $12,000 to settle the case. Pearson refused that, but later reduced the amount of his lawsuit to $54 million.

The case ended in June, 2007, when a judge ruled against Pearson and in favor of the Chung family, which owned the cleaners. The judge also ordered Pearson to pay the Chungs' legal fees. The Chungs ended up raising money to cover legal costs.

"Now, a year later, we have a new mountain forming -- all in relation to one pair of pants," said Chris Manning, the Chungs' attorney. "We are hoping that we are victorious in appeal, but the important thing to take away is that no one wins, everyone loses in a case like this."

Pearson also lost his job as a judge. He filed a $1 million lawsuit against the District in May 2008, demanding compensation and his job back.

The lawsuit's return has many dry cleaners distraught.

"To me, it doesn't make any sense to me at all -- it's just nonsense," said Alison Lee, of Sun Cleaners.

On September 25, 2008 The New York Times reported in Charge dropped against man accused of passing gas:

A West Virginia man accused of passing gas and fanning it toward a police officer no longer faces a battery charge. The Kanawha County prosecutor's office requested that the charge be dropped against 34-year-old Jose Cruz.

According to a criminal complaint, Cruz passed gas and made a fanning motion toward patrolman T.E. Parsons after being taken to the police station for a breathalyzer test. Cruz denies fanning the gas and says his request to use a restroom when first arriving at the station was denied.

An assistant says Magistrate Jack Pauley signed a motion to dismiss the charge Thursday.

Cruz, who was arrested Tuesday, still faces driving under the influence and other charges.
We are happy to hear that the silly charges brought against Mr. Cruz were dropped. We will be happier yet when the Pants Suit is dropped and the lawyer/ex-judge is sanctioned.

Labels:


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?