.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Sunday, May 25, 2008

 
NEEDED CHANGES IN DORCHESTER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE

We note the comments to Crisis chaplaincy to serve sheriff's office.

We do not agree either that Coastal Crisis Chaplaincy should work for free or that this group is somehow connected with the Christan Exodus Movement. We do agree, however, that it is well past time for the Dorchester County Sheriff's Office to transfer these duties to someone other than Mr. Shackelford and Mr. Weeks.

Our position on the "Prisoner Recreation Funds" has been discussed many times on this Blog. For example, in "HOW ARE THOSE "JAIL FUNDS" BEING USED AGAIN?" we wrote:

On June 15, 2002, after Dorchester County Council seized control of the Federal Prisoner Housing Fund, Sheriff Nash stated that the "Prisoner Recreation Fund" that was being generated from prisoner telephone toll calls was being used to pay "Chaplains" Weeks and Don Shackelford a total of $14,400 per year (12 x 2 x $600).

We also wrote:

At the risk of both repeating ourselves and offending some Nash supporters, we note that, by his own admission, Sheriff Nash does not know how much money the Prisoner Recreation Fund generates, how it is being used, how much has been spent, how much has been embezzled, or even whether some of the charges being imposed are lawful. More important, from our standpoint, there is simply no way that an intelligent and rationale person can argue that Sheriff Nash is using these funds for the "benefit" of the prisoners. Therefore, we reiterate that we think an Independent Board should be created to oversee this program. Additionally, we think that this Independent Board should include Dorchester County Jail Inmates; after all, if the fund is for their benefit, they should have some input into the determination of what most benefits them.



 
POPULAR ELECTION OF JUDGES--A GOOD THING?

The New York Times reports in "Rendering Justice, With One Eye on Re-election:"

The question of how best to select judges has baffled lawyers and political scientists for centuries, but in the United States most states have made their choice in favor of popular election. The tradition goes back to Jacksonian populism, and supporters say it has the advantage of making judges accountable to the will of the people. A judge who makes a series of unpopular decisions can be challenged in an election and removed from the bench.

Read the rest of the article at Rendering Justice, With One Eye on Re-election. Then tell us whether popular elections of judges would better insure that the rights of parents are protected. Would the practice result in greater scrutiny and accountability or would it result in mob rule?

Labels:


Tuesday, May 13, 2008

 
SOUTH CAROLINA PRISONS EXPECTED TO OVERSPEND BY $4.3 MILLION

The Post and Courier reveals, "Despite a frugal daily diet of $1.43 worth of macaroni, rice, turkey parts and organ meat for each of its 23,977 prisoners, the state Department of Corrections can't pay its bills and the agency is considering closing some facilities. The department expects to overspend by $4.3 million in the current fiscal year, which ends June 30." Read the entire article, including reader comments, at Prisons expected to overspend by $4.3 M.

The comments are pretty heated. For example, ColdBeer comes down pretty hard on SCGal, perhaps unfairly. The fact is that our incarceration rate is, and has been, higher than any of the other “first world” countries for some period of time—we have both been getting "tough on crime" and "fighting the drug war" for over thirty years. And while we have seen drops in violent crime rates, we have seen rises in petty crimes. More important, at the rate we are going, those who are not in prison will eventually have no discretionary funds because they will have to spend everything on building more jails.

We understand the frustrations of the populace with our prison system. But, the "solutions" being advanced by many of the hardliners are not workable in the United States because of our Constitution and the prohibitions against cruel and unusual punishment. The will have to move either to China, Iraq, or Guantanamo Bay to get what they want.

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?