Tuesday, May 31, 2005
A READER COMMENTS ON MARCH 30 POST AND WE RESPOND
Comments:
Why didn't the appellate attorney submit a motion for expungement while he was taking the thousands of dollars addressing an issue ---already ruled on so many times ---that the Supreme Court saw no need to explain it again?--- Oops --- "NEVERMIND."
# posted by McLaren583
Comments:
Why didn't the appellate attorney submit a motion for expungement while he was taking the thousands of dollars addressing an issue ---already ruled on so many times ---that the Supreme Court saw no need to explain it again?--- Oops --- "NEVERMIND."
# posted by McLaren583
Response:
We do not know if your question has been answered elsewhere on this BLOG, but the issue of the Expungement was not before the Supreme Court. And many Family Court Judges and many Family Court Lawyers do not seem to realize that those found to be in Civil Contempt are actually processed in the same manner as they would have been processed had they either been convicted or charged with a crime. They are handcuffed, fingerprinted, and photographed.
# posted by PARENT'S RIGHTS
We do not know if your question has been answered elsewhere on this BLOG, but the issue of the Expungement was not before the Supreme Court. And many Family Court Judges and many Family Court Lawyers do not seem to realize that those found to be in Civil Contempt are actually processed in the same manner as they would have been processed had they either been convicted or charged with a crime. They are handcuffed, fingerprinted, and photographed.
# posted by PARENT'S RIGHTS
