Sunday, July 23, 2006
“ROE V. WADE FOR MEN" DISMISSED
The so-called “Roe v. Wade for Men” case has been dismissed by a Michigan Federal Court Judge. We agree with Roger Sinasohn at http://www.bloggingbaby.com/., who wrote "What Mr. Dubay fails to realize is that he has--and, more importantly, had--the right to avoid procreation. He failed, unfortunately, to exercise that right when he had sex without wearing a condom. Because he did not take steps to prevent the pregnancy, he is fully responsible for it....Luckily, U.S. District Judge David M. Lawson agreed and dismissed the case in federal court. Dubay won't even get a chance to waste taxpayers' money on a trial, a good thing in my opinion." However, for an opposing view click on http://www.nationalcenterformen.org/page9.shtml.
The so-called “Roe v. Wade for Men” case has been dismissed by a Michigan Federal Court Judge. We agree with Roger Sinasohn at http://www.bloggingbaby.com/., who wrote "What Mr. Dubay fails to realize is that he has--and, more importantly, had--the right to avoid procreation. He failed, unfortunately, to exercise that right when he had sex without wearing a condom. Because he did not take steps to prevent the pregnancy, he is fully responsible for it....Luckily, U.S. District Judge David M. Lawson agreed and dismissed the case in federal court. Dubay won't even get a chance to waste taxpayers' money on a trial, a good thing in my opinion." However, for an opposing view click on http://www.nationalcenterformen.org/page9.shtml.
Labels: Wasting Court Time
