Monday, February 12, 2007
SOMEONE IS IN FAVOR OF "ROE V. WADE FOR MEN"
We would like to know who posted the comment to the March 10, 2006 Post. We would also like a response to the questions [If the father wins the case]:
- How should we determine which fathers should be required to support their children and which should not be required to support their children?
- Should husbands be allowed to opt out of supporting their biological children?
- What if a child has disabilities that increase the cost of raising the child, but decrease the likelihood of a successful adoption--should the father be allowed to opt out under those circumstances?
- How much would you be willing to increase your taxes in order to support all those children whose fathers opt out of supporting them?"
Until these questions are answered, we do not understand how anyone could logically support allowing fathers to opt out of the duty of support. We note that this is especially true given the fact that the AP reports that, according to U. S. Census figures, out-of-wedlock births in the U.S. are at an all-time high of nearly 40%. This is because, if the fathers are allowed to opt-out, the rest of us will have to help shoulder the financial burden of raising these children.
Labels: Wasting Court Time
