.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Saturday, May 05, 2007

 
FRAUD INQUIRY LOOKS AT LAWYERS IN DIET-DRUG CASE

This article discusses a case in which the Court approved attorney's fees charged by the the attorneys for the prevailing party. Although it is not a domestic case, this case does illustrate both the need for placing caps both on what may be charged to the litigants and the imprecision of the word "reasonable."

Just because a judge says a fee is reasonable, does not make it so. Ands just because a judge says that a fee is unreasonable does not make it so.

Comments: Post a Comment



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?