.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

 
SC GOV. ISSUES STATEMENT ON PASSAGE OF IMMIGRATION REFORM

The following appeared in today's Post and Couirer:

"Since Washington has failed to act on this issue, I think that as a state we have to be very clear about not creating incentives for illegal behavior," Gov. Sanford said. "I want to thank the House - in particular Speaker Harrell, Chairman Harrison, and over on the Senate side Senator Ritchie - for acting quickly to address this issue. It's important because with other states in the Southeast contemplating or having passed similar legislation, if we don't act we run the risk of becoming a sanctuary for illegal immigration. Legal immigration has been and continues to be part of what makes this country great, but at the same time we have to send a clear message that South Carolina won't sanction illegal behavior with a wink and a nod. As we've long said, the ultimate fix for this problem will have to come from Washington, but this bill is a step forward and I'd urge both the House and Senate to get it to my desk as soon as possible."

The bills would require all South Carolina employers doing business with the state to be able to verify the citizenship of their workers, and would deny business expense deductions to employers of illegal workers. In addition, the bills would create a state felony for harboring or transporting illegal aliens, would create more penalties for ID fraud in connection with illegal immigration, and would direct SLED to execute a memorandum of understanding with the federal government to serve as an auxiliary immigration enforcement agency.
South Carolina Law already requires all employers to provide the State with the names, addressess, Social Security Numbers, and dates of births of new hires. These existing legal duties on the part of the employer make many of the provisions of the proposed "anti-immigration" bills unnecessary. As we have said before, "we should try enforcing old laws before enacting new laws that may both be unconstitutional and have unintended consequences."

Comments: Post a Comment



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?