Thursday, December 03, 2009
DID SOUTH CAROLINA JUDGE GET TREATED FAIRLY?
The Post and Courier has reported that Judge Segars-Andrews' "rating remains the same" and that she will not be eligible for re-election to the bench. This seems like a high price to pay for exercising a discretionary decision that, in hindsight, may have been a bad decision. After all, the lawyer who failed to report the conflict to Judge Segars-Andrews at the outset of the proceedings has apparently escaped unscathed.
Labels: Family Court Reform, Judicial Reform
