.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Sunday, February 28, 2010

 
FAMILY FEUD OVER RELIGION OR GRANDSTANDING CONTEMPT?

A case that has been characterized as a "family feud over religion" is currently playing out in Chicago. The transcript of an ABC interview and the video of that interview set the scene for the upcoming March 3 trial. And this article provides an update.

From our perspective, this case is more about defiance of a Court Order and violation of an implied agreement than it is about freedom of religion. Mr. Reyes admits that his wife insisted that he convert to Judaism. And not only did he convert--after they were married, no less-- but he had not renounced his Jewish faith as of the birth of his daughter. Therefore, like it or not, Mr. Reyes' daughter is a Jew and his belated attempts "to exercise his First Amendment Rights" by baptizing her without his wife's permission rings just as hollow and cynical as his attempts to frame Catholicism as a branch of Judaism.

Again, if Mr. Reyes were sincere, he would not have summoned the press to record and witness his act of defiance while simultaneously proclaiming his innocence of the act of contempt. And, if he were truly a Catholic as he now claims, he would have both renounced Judaism and converted to Catholicism before he baptized his daughter, not sometime in the future.

Labels: ,


Comments:
I have to side with the Father here. Sorry, but the wife is way, way out of line. When the parents belong to two different faiths, it seems to be fair to allow each parent to take the child to their chosen religion. Both the wife and the judge are way out of line, and are clearly violating the rights of Father, and attempting to meddle in religion. In that way, it is very similar to the FLDS case in Texas, in which once the children were taken into custody, they were not allowed to freely practice their religion, nor were given access to their scriptures.
 
We think you are missing the point. The father is not Catholic. And the Court is not "meddling," but is only enforcing an agreement between the parties on a "temporary basis" until the matter can be heard on the mertis."

Had the father not converted to Judaism before his marriage, we think this would be a horse of a different color.

We don't know enough about the Texas case to comment. But we understand that that case involved massive instances of child rape and coerced sexual intercourse.
 
Post a Comment



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?