.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Sunday, January 31, 2010

 
MAN MISTAKENLY FREED FROM PRISON SURRENDERS

In "Man mistakenly freed from prison surrenders", The Post and Courier reports:
Herman Sammie Rigby Jr.was released from prison in October 2008.

A man wanted by Dorchester County sheriff's deputies turned himself in early Saturday, according to a statement from the Sheriff's Office.

They were looking for a man mistakenly released from prison more than a year ago.

Herman Sammie Rigby Jr. was released Oct. 9, 2008, from the S.C. Department of Corrections after he had served a sentence for robbery. In April 2008, Rigby was charged with a series of kidnappings and sexual assaults that occurred in the Summerville and Dorchester County area more than 20 years ago.

Rigby, 52, had been served with warrants and charged with the crimes and was placed under bond by a Dorchester County judge. He was returned to prison to continue serving his sentence, according to the Sheriff's Office. After completing his sentence on the robbery, he was to have been returned to Dorchester County to be held pending trial on the kidnapping and sexual assault charges. He was mistakenly released.

The Sheriff's Office learned of his release when an alleged victim called Summerville police and asked about Rigby's status. When police learned he was no longer in prison, they contacted the Sheriff's Office and a warrant was obtained.
We are pleased to learn that Mr. Rigby surrendered himself and that he is now in custody. One has to wonder, though, how he managed to remain hidden for over a year. Maybe he was staying with the 70,000 people who have been dodging child support in South Carolina.

Labels: ,


Saturday, January 30, 2010

 
TIME TO TELL PUBLIC HOW MONEY IS SPENT IN FAMILY COURTS AND SHERIFFS' OFFICES

We posted "TELL PUBLIC HOW MONEY IS SPENT IN FAMILY COURTS AND SHERIFFS' OFFICES" on June 2, 2009. Given South Carolina's increasing unemployment rates and declining ability to provide social services for its most vulnerable citizens, we renew the call.

Labels: ,


Friday, January 29, 2010

 
THE GOVERNATOR WANTS TO SEND CALIFORNIA INMATES TO MEXICO

Facing record deficits, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger wants to build prisons in Mexico so that he can send all the illegal Mexican immigrants currently serving time in California prisons back to Mexico. According to Yahoo News, the Governator claims that enacting his proposal will save California $1 Billion per year in prison costs. Whether Governor Schwarzenegger's cost-saving estimates are accurate may be debatable. However, the fact that California is even discussing this idea as a means of reducing prison overcrowding and the tax burden on California residents suggests that there is an increasing national awareness that "lock 'em up and throw away the key" is an economically unsustainable solution to crime.

Those who are interested in reading the entire Yahoo News article should click here.

Labels:


Thursday, January 28, 2010

 
PASSPORT DENIAL PROGRAM IN ALL FIFTY-FOUR STATES AND TERRITORIES IN THE US--INCLUDING SC

According to Rebecca Hamil of the Federal [Child Support] Enforcement and Collections [Division?] of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, "All 54 states and territories participate in the Passport Denial Program. South Carolina's contact for the program is Glenn Hastie. If you have further questions about the program, you can contact him at (803) 898-9468."

For information about the Passport Denial Program, click here.

Labels: , ,


Wednesday, January 27, 2010

 
OCTOMOM ENJOYS THE BEACH--YOUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK

Although we do not find her in the least bit attractive, physically or otherwise, we have to admit that Octomom has done an extraordinary job of shedding the weight she gained during her last pregnancy. Thanks to the taxpayers of California, who are footing her hospital bills and assisting her with the costs of raising her children, she apparently does not have to work and has time to exercise and go to the beach.

We said it before, and we may say it again, from our point of view, California ought to make both Octomom's fertility doctor and the biological father of her children provide financial assistance for these children and reimburse the government for the medical costs associated with the birth of these children. While it may be true that "it takes a village to raise a child," people who choose to go to extraordinary lengths to impregnate a women with an entire village of children should be the ones saddled with the costs of raising that particular village of children.

Labels: , ,


Tuesday, January 26, 2010

 
WHAT SOUTH CAROLINA LT. GOVERNOR ANDRE BAUER DOES NOT KNOW

Based upon a viewing of the video of South Carolina Lt. Governor Andre Bauer's controversial speech, it is apparent that he either does not know or does not care that "The National School Lunch Program" is a federal program established in 1946 under President Truman. Therefore, if Mr. Bauer wants to either end or modify that program, he should run for Congress and--if elected--team up with Jim DeMint to "stop the madness."

Unfortunately, the "National School Lunch Program” is not the only federal assistance program of which Lt. Governor Bauer appears to be unfamiliar. As noted in today’s Post and Courier editorial “Bauer's beastly 'metaphor'," “Perhaps Mr. Bauer missed out on the comprehensive welfare reform that restricted federal aid to families with dependent children, and the related efforts aimed at halting the culture of dependency.”

Although the editorial does not refer to the Clinton era legislation by name, the referenced legislation is the “1996 Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act.” Furthermore, as we have written on a number of occasions, a major component of this act is the requirement that States set up a system to identify the fathers of illegitimate children, set child support obligations, and enforce those obligations through such methods as wage with-holding. And although South Carolina has accepted hundreds of millions of dollars in federal aid to DSS and has also been fined approximately $72 Million for its failure to implement a state-wide computerized child support tracking and collection system, the State remains the only State in the Country that has no such system. This system, which should have been in place by 1998, is not scheduled to come on-line until September of 2011. Therefore, South Carolina will in all likelihood be fined another $20 Million or so before the system is operational.

Under the circumstances, maybe Mr. Bauer should spend some of his energies putting a fire under the butts of DSS and the South Carolina General Assembly rather than engaging in hate/fear-mongering against Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) recipients who have satisfied their eligibility requirements. After all, the State of South Carolina itself is the real "Deadbeat" for accepting money from the federal government while not meeting its obligations.

Labels: , , ,


Monday, January 25, 2010

 
NEW HIRE REPORTING--COMPARING STATUTORY LANGUAGE WITH LETTER FROM DSS

Let us pretend for a few minutes that you are the owner of a large South Carolina construction company who received this letter from the South Carolina Department of Social Services advising you that you must report all new hires and rehires to the South Carolina Child Support Enforcement Division. Naturally, you would take it to your attorney. And then your attorney would call your attention to South Carolina Code Ann. Section 63-17-1210 (1976, as amended) which clearly provides that new hire reporting is voluntary, rather than mandatory as indicated in the letter from DSS.

So what would you do? Would you ignore both your attorney and the General Assembly and both incur additional administrative costs and risk losing some of your employees to the barbwire hotel? Or would you file the DSS letter in the circular filing cabinet?

Labels: , ,


Sunday, January 24, 2010

 
UPDATES JOHN EDWARDS/JUDGE SEGARS-ANDREWS/BRISTOL PALIN

Edwards Admits Paternity

The Associated Press has reported "Edwards admits he fathered videographer's child" and has agreed to pay child support. According to the article, "In the statement Edwards released Thursday, he said, 'I will do everything in my power to provide her (Frances) with the love and support she deserves...I have been providing financial support for Quinn and have reached an agreement with her mother to continue providing support in the future. "

There has been no word yet on the terms of the financial settlement.

Judge Screenings on Hold

According to "Judge screenings on hold," "One of South Carolina’s top lawmakers said the state will postpone screening of judge candidates until the state Supreme Court settles legal questions about the process." Consequently, judicial elections will also be postponed.

This whole process may be confusing to most folks. But, South Carolina State Senator Nathan Ballentine illuminates the process and provides some useful links at his Blog. Still, in any event, this case is very important, which is why the Supreme Court of South Carolina has granted an expedited hearing.

Bristol Palin "Demands" Child Support

CNN reports that "Bristol Palin demands child support." While some folks appear to be upset about this development, we are neither surprised nor outraged. If Ms. Palin's Pleadings are to be believed, Levi Johnston--the "sperm donor" baby daddy--has generated a pretty good income from his relationship with the Palin family. So there is no reason why he should not provide for his child.

Labels: , , , ,


Saturday, January 23, 2010

 
SC SHOULD ENFORCE EXISTING LAWS BEFORE PASSING NEW LAWS

This is the time of year when members of the South Carolina General Assembly historically introduce reams of useless and pandering legislation in a transparent effort to placate powerful supporters and special interest groups. Even South Carolina's Lt. Governor Andre Bauer--who wants to be Governor and is apparently ignorant of the content and purpose of "The Welfare Reform Act of 1996"--is getting in on the act.

Our impulse is to "out" those who appear to be the worst transgressors of this pandering practice. However, rather than just attacking folks on this Blog, we prefer to try to offer solutions to problems. Additionally, we often try to include links to law cases, statutes, scholarly articles, studies and government publications that support our positions. For example, note "SOLVING THE CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTION PROBLEM IN SC."

For reasons that the South Carolina General Assembly and DSS apparently do not understand, South Carolinians are owed more than $1.5 Billion in past due child support. And, addressing this problem is, in our opinion, far more important than introducing additional welfare reform legislation because it will help get custodial parents off of welfare.

Simply stated, State and Federal Legislation already exists to address the problem of irresponsible parents whose children must depend on welfare. South Carolina just has to have the WILL to act legally, morally, and ethically by enforcing the Laws that already exist and insisting that those in government do their jobs. That means, in case we have not made ourselves clear--South Carolina should carry out the mandates set forth in "The Welfare Reform Act of 1996"--identify the fathers of illegitimates, locate them, bring them into court, set a child support obligation, make the non-custodial parents pay child support, distribute the money to the custodial parents or guardians of the children, and get the mothers off of welfare.

Labels: , , , , ,


Friday, January 22, 2010

 
IMPLEMENTING SUCCESSFUL PROGRAMS TO REDUCE CHILD SUPPORT ARREARAGES IN SOUTH CAROLINA

Click here to access one of the most recent Child Support Reports from the Office of Child Support Enforcement. Note what steps other states are taking to decrease their child support arrearages. If we had Larry McKeown’s job, we would implement programs that have proven successful in other States. For example, even though the South Carolina General Assembly has chosen to defy Federal Law by making New Hire Reporting optional, there is nothing to prevent Mr. McKeown from creating a New Hire Directory and encouraging businesses to file new hire documents with the CSED.

As explained by the State of Arizona, there are many benefits to be had from establishing a New Hire Reporting Program. And did we mention that implementation of this program is mandated by Federal Law?

Labels: , ,


Thursday, January 21, 2010

 
SOUTH CAROLINA MAY MAKE SOME REASONABLE COST- SAVING PRISON REFORMS

Although Laura Hudson, Executive Director of the South Carolina Victim's Council objects, it appears that South Carolina may decide to follow the example of Michigan rather than follow the example of Florida.

According to "Legislative report to call for changes":

A legislative committee will release a report by Feb. 1 that will call for changes in the punishments for dozens of crimes and will suggest using more alternative sentences for non-violent criminals.

The state's overcrowded prisons are a driving force behind the report, which is the result of more than a year of study by the S.C. Sentencing Reform Commission.

"I wouldn't say it's the number one reason, but it's an issue," said Sen. Gerald Malloy, D-Darlington, the commission chairman. "In order to continue on the path we're headed, we're going to have to build more prisons, and we don't have the funds to do that."

The commission hopes its recommendations ensure public safety by sending high-risk, violent offenders to jail for longer terms, Malloy said. At the same time, the state will need to reduce the prison time for other crimes.

The commission also will recommend that the state beef up its Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services to better supervise criminals once they are released from prison.

The commission will present draft legislation based on the report, Malloy said. The challenge will be finding money in a strapped state budget to implement some of the recommendations.

"The real answer to this is to build a new prison," said Laura Hudson, S.C. Crime Victims Council executive director.
Now, if the counties can just figure out which of those who are behind on their child support payments really deserve to be incarcerated for willful contempt. If they do that, maybe they will not have to either continue to increase the size of county jails or build new jails. Or, they will at least be able to determine whether the tax payers are benefiting from the incarceration of "Deadbeats."

Labels: , , ,


Wednesday, January 20, 2010

 
WILL MOREDOCK CALLS OUT THE SOUTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY TO STOP PANDERING AND TO DO ITS JOB

In his January 11, 2010 post "Official Child Neglect by the S.C. General Assembly and Governor Mark Sanford," South Carolina journalist/author/columnist/blogger Will Moredock challenges those who can make a difference to make a difference.

Some folks who are familiar with Mr. Moredock's work may pass this off as just another case of "Left-wing whining." However, we remind them that Mr. Moredock is writing about the "Welfare Reform Act" and South Carolina's failure to implement programs designed both to get mothers and children off of welfare and to make fathers financially responsible for their children--not exactly your usual "Left-wing whining." Additionally, we take this opportunity to point out that Mr. Moredock appears to be suggesting that government ought to be both accountable and competent--again not your usual "Left-wing whining" sort of idea.

Labels: , , ,


Tuesday, January 19, 2010

 
HHS ANNOUNCES CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT INCENTIVE AWARD GRANTS

We must admit that we were surprised when we read "Child Support Enforcement Program First Quarter Incentive Award Grants". South Carolina actually received some money. Whether the money will have to be paid back is yet to be determined. But, at least for the time being, our prediction appears to be off base.

Labels:


Monday, January 18, 2010

 
EFFECTIVENESS OF PASSPORT DENIAL PROGRAM IN COLLECTING CHILD SUPPORT ARREARAGES

According to an article titled "Paid in Time for the Holidays" in the December 2009 issue of The Child Support Report from the Federal Office of Child Support Enforcement:
Bells aren’t the only thing jingling this holiday season—12 families will have extra coins in their pockets. But this is no holiday happenstance; it’s the result of collections from noncustodial parents whose passports have been denied through the Federal Passport Denial program. The payments are attributed to either overseas employment opportunities or leisure travel plans for the noncustodial parents.
Since 1998 the passport denial program has collected over $183 million in voluntarily reported lump-sum payments.
Although the Passport Denial Program is no panacea to the national child support arrearage problem, a program that has resulted in the collection of $183 Million and has uncovered untold numbers of child support scofflaws"--is better than a punch in the nose. So those who think that the person who owes them back child support is traveling on a U. S. passport may want to contact Rebecca Hamil at (202) 205-5612 for assistance.

Labels: , ,


Sunday, January 17, 2010

 
"OCTOMOM" DEFENDS FERTILITY DOCTOR AGAINST ACCUSATIONS OF NEGLIGENCE

According to KTLA News of Los Angeles:
"Octomom" Nadya Suleman is defending the doctor who helpedher conceive 14 children, including her famous octuplets, after the California Medical Board accused him of negligence and violating professional guidelines.

In a video posted to RadarOnline.com, Suleman said Dr. Michael Kamrava did nothing wrong. She joked that, if the doctor loses his license, she doesn't know who she'll get treatment from if she wants more babies.

The state licensing board says Kamrava, a fertility doctor in Beverly Hills, acted "beyond the reasonable judgment of any treating physician" in treating Suleman, who's identified by her initials only in the complaint. According to the document filed Dec. 22, Kamrava displayed repeated negligence during his treatment of Suleman, beginning in 1997 and culminating in the Jan. 26, 2009, birth of her octuplets.
We think Dr. Kamrava's actions are indefensible and that he should be held accountable for them. But those interested in reading the entire referenced article can click Octomom" Defends Doc Against Accusations of Negligence.

Labels:


Saturday, January 16, 2010

 
STUDY: CHILDREN'S HEALTH SERVICES AFFECTED BY SC BUDGET CUTS

Yvonne Wenger writes in "Study: Children's health services affected":

Hundreds of thousands of South Carolina children are doing without health care, going hungry, coping on their own with mental health problems and lacking intervention for addictions and pregnancies.

And in neglecting the needs of children, the state is failing itself by adding more costs long-term and stunting South Carolina's prosperity, former Democratic Gov. Dick Riley said Monday.

Riley's comments came with the release of a new report, "The children's budget: behind the numbers," which measures the impact state budget cuts have had on the services provided to children. The report was put out by South Carolina Appleseed Legal Justice Center with the backing of about 65 advocacy groups.

"Hungry children can't learn; sick children can't excel," Riley said. "We must step up to the plate as a state and do what's best for our children."

The report's release coincides with the Legislature's return to session today. Each legislator will be given a copy of the report and the advocacy groups will push for the state to restore programs and services to children, Sue Berkowitz, director of Appleseed Legal Justice Center, said.

Berkowitz said the state must re-evaluate how it raises revenue and decide whether to make changes in taxation to meet the needs of children.

The report found:

• More than 22,000 fewer children will receive community-based mental health services in 2010 than in 2007.

• An expansion of state Children's Health Insurance Program has room for 70,000 children, but only 16,000 are enrolled. The Department of Health and Human Services is suppressing enrollment as a cost-saving measure, according to the report.

• The Department of Social Services has not had an increase in its workforce since 1993 despite the fact that the number of individuals who receive food stamps has almost doubled since that time to 745,307 individuals, including approximately 360,000 children.

• Nearly 2,000 individuals are on the waiting list to receive Medicaid-funded mental retardation, autism and head and spinal cord services through the Department of Disabilities and Special Needs.

• Fewer than half of the approximately 18,500 children who suffer from substance abuse in the state will get help through the Department of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Services in this fiscal year.

• Approximately, 5,000 teens at risk of getting pregnant will not receive counseling, after-school programs and guidance to help them complete school because teen pregnancy prevention funds have been cut in half.

The coalition of advocacy groups that back the report have not adopted recommendations with regard to taxes, but John Ruoff, program director for South Carolina Fair Share, said legislators must consider some alternatives to raising money. Such ideas include removing the cap on sales tax for cars and adding a surcharge to people who earn $500,000 or more, he said.

BY THE NUMBERS

45 — South Carolina's ranking nationally for overall child wellbeing.

25 — The percentage of incoming ninth- graders who drop out of high school.

10 — The percentage of children who fail first, second or third grade.

26 — The percentage of children younger than six who live in poverty.

13 — The percentage of children younger than 17 who had no health insurance in 2007.

33 — The percentage of children between 10 and 17 who are obese.

Source: "The children's budget: behind the numbers" by the South Carolina Appleseed Legal Justice Center

This is alarming news. But, we can't help thinking that if South Carolina would make more of an effort to collect the child support arrearages, that many of these children would lead better lives.

Labels:


Friday, January 15, 2010

 
"PARENTAL ALIENATION SYNDROME": ALIVE AND WELL IN BRAZIL?

Attorney Jeanne M. Hannah writes on her Blog Updates in Michigan Family Law:

David Goldman and his supporters, as well as many commentators have expressed concerns that the Brazilian family has exercised enormous mind control over Sean Goldman and that the parental alienation he's experienced will create some difficulties for him in adjusting to life back in the United States. To get an idea of just how capable, how ruthless the Lins e Silva family might be in using parental alienation in this case, watch this 10-minute segment of a lecture delivered by Joao Paulo Lins e Silva, a lawyer specializing in family law in Rio de Janeiro. Lins e Silva delivered this lecture at a conference at The Hague. Then imagine him tutoring Bruna Goldman and her Brazilian mother in the techniques of parental alienation.

For the record Joao Paulo Lins e Silva is the father of Paulo Lins e Silva, also a family law attorney. The younger Lins e Silva married Bruna Goldman in Brazil even though she wasn't divorced from David. Below is Part I of "Parental Alienation Syndrome", available at YouTube. [Lins e Silva has to say that some folks at his luncheon table educated him about not calling this "a syndrome" anymore.]
Click here to access both the video of the lecture and Ms. Hannah's article. There are those that argue that Parental Alienation Syndrome is non-existent. But if Ms. Hannah is to be believed, it not only exists, but is alive and well in Brazil.

Labels: ,


Thursday, January 14, 2010

 
FAMILY COURT JUDGE CAUSES ANOTHER ACCIDENT WAITING TO HAPPEN

Check out "New Jersey Judge Calls Surrogate Legal Mother of Twins," which discusses a rather unusual New Jersey custody case between a gay couple and the woman who acted as the surrogate for them. In this case, "The gestational surrogate, who is not genetically related to the babies and carried them in an arrangement with her brother and his male spouse, now has the right to seek primary custody of the children."

So much for the sanctity of contracts. So much for the biological rights of sperm donors and egg donors. So much for the concept of "Equal Protection under the Law." Regardless of one's views on same-sex marriages, adoption by gays, fertility clinics, and surrogacy, this ruling is blatant over-reaching judicial lawmaking that is guaranteed to have serious negative consequences, not only on the parties in the case but on couples who are this very minute making arrangements with fertility clinics and surrogates to create a family.

Granted, there may be an unreported epidemic of gay couples who are unfit to be parents in the State of New Jersey and who are hiring surrogates to incubate fetuses for them in order to avoid the investigation associated with adoptions. Still, if this is a problem, it is a problem for the Legislature, not a Family Court Judge who wants to use his enormous powers to make a point.

Labels: ,


Wednesday, January 13, 2010

 
LINKS TO THE COMPLETE RESPONSES OF SC DSS TO BUDGET PROVISOS REGARDING COMPUTERIZED CHILD SUPPORT TRACKING AND COLLECTION SYSTEM

We belive that the South Carolina State house freshmen have received ther answers to their questions--sort of. Following are the three links to DSS’s “explanations" of why it has failed to comply with the Federal Mandate to install a computerized child support tracking and collection system in South Carolina:
A careful review of these documents reveals that the South Carolina General Assembly shares at least part of the blame for this mess. And again, this fiasco has cost the State of South Carolina over $72 Million in fines to date with more guaranteed to come.

Labels: , ,


Tuesday, January 12, 2010

 
ARIZONA BABY GABRIEL IS STILL MISSING

“An Arizona couple who tried to adopt an 8-month-old baby who’s been missing since Christmas say they now feel the mother of the baby duped and used them.” “Baby Gabriel’s mom ‘played us,’ couple say.”

Labels:


Monday, January 11, 2010

 
PROBLEMS AT THE SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES AND WHO BEARS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEM

Admittedly, we should have been able to find this document earlier. However, a careful review of the document will review that there is nothing “murky” about who caused the "Mess at DSS." The only thing that is murky is what steps are being taken to rectify the overall problems including, but not limited to, the lack of the mandated computer system, the lack of a New Hire Reporting Directory, and the Legislature’s failure to amend Legislation that clearly conflicts with Federal Law and that could result in a loss of Federal Funding.

We call your attention to the following:
December 30, 2004 - In a letter dated December 30, 2004, OCSE told DSS they would not approve the RFP because the RFP stated that allocation of child support collections for all case types must be based on state law. OCSE said state law conflicted with the federally mandated allocation hierarchy. To address the allocation issue, the State first sought to negotiate the issue with federal authorities. When this did not provide relief, the General Assembly amended state statute to conform with federal law during the 2004-2005 legislative session. This allowed DSS to amend the RFP and gain federal approval (emphasis added).

Labels: ,


Sunday, January 10, 2010

 
WHERE IS BABY GABRIEL? ARIZONA WOMAN CLAIMS TO HAVE GIVEN CHILD TO UNKNOWN STRANGERS

ABC News reports "Where is Baby Gabriel? Arizona Woman Refuses to Help Police Find Missing Son."

Labels:


Saturday, January 09, 2010

 
JUDICIAL REFORM EFFORTS IN NEW YORK ARE FAILING

According to Reform of New York’s Small-Town Courts Stalls, a "modest compromise bill" pending before the Legislature to revamp the state’s network of inferior courts is failing. The article goes on to say:

The most ambitious efforts in decades to reform New York State’s vast network of small-town courts — where sessions can be held in a garage, and where more than 1,450 judges who are not lawyers conduct trials —have stalled in Albany. Even a seemingly modest compromise, one that would allow a defendant to request that the judge be a lawyer, seems doomed, its sponsor says...After a series of articles in The New York Times in 2006 showed extensive failings in the courts — including town and village justices who mishandled money, made racist remarks, released friends without bail, denied some defendants lawyers and jailed some of them without trials — state court officials appointed that commission, which concluded by proposing the measure that Mr. O’Donnell later introduced (emphasis added).
Sadly, the problems revealed in New York sound all too familiar.

Labels: , ,


Friday, January 08, 2010

 
A DETAILED REPORT ON THE STATUS OF THE SC CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT SYSTEM

On February 24, 2009 we wrote:
We do not know whether DSS has yet presented the South Carolina with "a detailed report on the status of the Child Support Enforcement System including actions currently being undertaken to become compliant with federal government requirements; the cost required to meet minimum federal guidelines; total funds spent so far on the system; the amount of fines assessed by the federal government associated with non-compliance; how much has been spent to satisfy actions taken by the state judicial system; and how much has been spent related to actions taken by any other entity which may have altered the amount required for meeting minimum federal guidelines." However, we remind everyone that this report was supposed to have been submitted to the General Assembly by August 31, 2008.
To our embarrassment we recently learned that the South Carolina Department of Social Service provided the General Assembly with Response to Proviso 26.25 of the FY 2008-2009 Appropriations Act almost six months prior to our post. In our defense, however, we requested a copy of this document both from members of the South Carolina General Assembly and some high ranking employees of the South Carolina Department of Social Services and they did not even acknowledge its existence.

We do not know why DSS would not provide a copy of the requested document. Nor do we know why the General Assembly and the media do not appear to be concerned about this ongoing problem. However, careful readers will note that, to date, the State of South Carolina has spent over $34,000,000 in development costs on this system and been fined over $63,000,000 with no end in sight and no real time frame for installing the program. Moreover, DSS's response to the General Assembly is both incomplete and evasive. More important, DSS's latest update to the General Assembly indicates that the State of South Carolina has been fined an additional $9,000,000 (total over $72,000,000) and has spent an additional $6,000,000 on the system. And it is now anticipated that the system will still not be ready until September of 2011.

Labels: , ,


 
SC MAN SENTENCED TO TO TEN YEARS FOR STEALING MEAT

According to "SC man sentenced to 10 years for stealing meat":

A South Carolina man has been sentenced to 10 years in prison for stealing an $80 slab of meat.

The Times and Democrat of Orangeburg reports Thursday that 51-year-old Mark Zachary of Orangeburg received the maximum sentence after jurors found him guilty Wednesday of shoplifting.

Prosecutors said the sentence was justified because the Aug. 26 theft from Reid's grocery store in Orangeburg was his ninth offense.

Authorities said when a store manager approached Zachary about the missing New York strip and the big bulk under his shirt, he fled, right into the arms of an off-duty police officer.

Assistant Solicitor Glenn Justis asked jurors "Where's the beef?" in his opening argument.

Zachary testified he was "massaging" the meat, not stealing it.
Not everyone is pleased with this result. In an on-line post Paul K. Fauteck, Psy. D., DABPS writes:

So in their wisdom, the people of South Carolina will keep Mark Zachary in prison for ten years for stealing an $80 slab of meat. Understandably, the people are annoyed because this is his ninth offense. So the people are going to spend approximately $240,000 to protect themselves against one meat thief??? Well, the people of South Carolina are sure tough on crime, aren't they? Maybe the good people of South Carolina should reconsider their priorities.
We have to say we agree with Dr. Fauteck. This kind of thinking is going to result in the early release of folks who should serve their entire sentences. It is also one of the reasons that the South Carolina prison system keeps exceeding its budget.

Labels:


Thursday, January 07, 2010

 
AMOUNT OF FEDERAL FINES IMPOSED AGAINST SC AS OF AUGUST 31, 2007

According to "DSS’s Response to Budget Proviso 13.27 of the FY 2008-2009 Appropriations Act":

Because of the State’s failure to have a certified statewide CSES operational by October 1, 1997, South Carolina became subject to federal penalties. The full federal penalties are severe. OCSE can disapprove the State’s Child support Enforcement (Title IV-D) State Plan because of the lack of the system. Disapproval would result in the OCSE’s withdrawal of all federal funding, about $22.8 million annually, for the State’s Child Support Enforcement program. The second level of penalty would be the potential disapproval of federal funding for the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program, potentially $99 million annually.

Congress made a less severe alternative penalty available to states that lacked a statewide system if the state was willing to work under federal oversight and under a corrective compliance plan designed to implement a system within a reasonable time.

In January 2001, OCSE notified the State that the alternative penalty was retroactive to federal fiscal year (FFY) 1998, and that continued availability of the alternative penalty to South Carolina is dependent on the State’s good faith efforts to develop and implement a federally certified statewide CSES. In January 2001, South Carolina elected to be subject to the alterative penalty and OCSE approved the corrective compliance plan.

The federal penalty is calculated by CSE for each federal fiscal year based largely on South Carolina's Child Support Enforcement program's actual expenditures, including system development expenditures, reported quarterly to OCSE by DSS.

The alternative penalties will be assessed until lifted by the federal authorities. When the State submits a letter to OCSE requesting certification of CSES, federal system penalties will be placed in abeyance while OCSE certifies CSES. Ninety percent (90%) of any system penalties actually paid for the federal fiscal year in which the letter was submitted are rebated by OCSE back to DSS once the CSES is certified.

For federal fiscal years 1998-2007, the amount of funding lost to penalties was $55,200,000. These penalties are paid with 100% state dollars.

Penalties will continue to be assessed until CSES is deployed and operational, currently projected for June 1, 2010. The amount of these projected penalties is $20,740,046, which includes a 90% reduction of penalties paid in the federal fiscal year in which statewide implementation is intended to occur.

Labels: , , , , ,


Wednesday, January 06, 2010

 
SOUTH CAROLINA AG'S OPINION ON "FAILURE TO SUPPORT" CRIMINAL STATUTE

The South Carolina Attorney General's Opinion on the "Failure to Support" Criminal Statute is a well-written, concise, and cogent document. Its existence raises two questions.

First, given South Carolina's abysmal child support collection rate and the AG's promise to pursue "Deadbeats," why is this statute not used more?

Second, with the availability of this statute, why is South Carolina's child support collection rate so abysmal?

Labels: ,


Tuesday, January 05, 2010

 
ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION AND NEW HIRE REPORTING IN GEORGIA

In "Gwinnett: Immigration Enforcement Working Well" it was reported:
The Gwinnett County Sheriff's Department says a program that allows specially trained sheriff's deputies to enforce federal immigration law is working well.

The program began on Nov. 16 when 18 deputies returned from training by federal authorities. The sheriff's department says 62 percent of the foreign-born population in the county jail has been found to be in the country illegally.

Deputies have placed immigration detainers on 286 inmates. The charges against them include aggravated assault, rape, child molestation, DUI, robbery, sex crimes and trafficking.

The program is called 287(g) after the section of immigration law that governs it. It has been championed by illegal immigration foes and decried by immigrant rights and civil liberties groups (emphasis added).
Lest there be confusion on the subject, we remind our readers that our primary focus is parents' rights, not immigration, illegal or otherwise. However, we note that Georgia created a New Hire Reporting Program as required by Federal Law. If Gwinnett County employers are complying with the New Hire Reporting Laws, then illegal employees should be identified before they commit rapes, engage in child molestation, or engage in trafficking.

The fact that 62% of the foreign-born detainees in Gwinnett County are illegal immigrants suggests that the State of Georgia is not either enforcing or monitoring compliance of the New Hire Reporting Laws. This may be one reason that the State of Georgia is collecting only about 55% of the child support that is supposed to be paid through the Court. And while Georgia's child support collection rate is far superior to that of many other States, this fact probably provides little comfort to the custodial parents and guardians who are collectively owed more that $2.6 Billion in the State of Georgia.

Labels:


Monday, January 04, 2010

 
SPENDING OURSELVES INTO POVERTY BY JAILING PEOPLE WHO DON'T BELONG THERE

The New York Times article, "Prisons and Budgets" raises some interesting issues:
The United States, which has less than 5 percent of the world’s population, has about one-quarter of its prisoners. But the relentless rise in the nation’s prison population has suddenly slowed as many states discover that it is simply too expensive to over incarcerate.

Between 1987 and 2007 the prison population nearly tripled, from 585,000 to almost 1.6 million. Much of that increase occurred in states — many with falling crime rates — that had adopted overly harsh punishment policies, such as the “three strikes and you’re out” rule and drug laws requiring that nonviolent drug offenders be locked away.

These policies have been hugely costly. According to the Pew Center on the States, state spending from general funds on corrections increased from $10.6 billion in 1987 to more than $44 billion in 2007, a 127 percent increase in inflation-adjusted dollars. In the same period, adjusted spending on higher education increased only 21 percent.

In 2008, the explosion of the prison population ground to a near halt, according to data released last month by the Bureau of Justice Statistics. About 739,000 inmates were admitted to federal and state facilities, only about 3,500 more than were released.

One factor seems to be tight budgets as states decide to release nonviolent offenders early. This can not only save money. If done correctly, it can also be very sound social policy. Many nonviolent offenders can be dealt with more effectively and more cheaply through treatment and jobs programs.

Michigan, which has been hard hit by the recession, has done a particularly good job of releasing people who do not need to be in prison. As the American Civil Liberties Union’s National Prison Project details in a new report, Michigan reduced its prison population by about 8 percent between March 2007 and November 2009 by taking smart steps, notably doing more to get nonviolent drug offenders out, while helping in their transition to a productive, and crime-free, life.

Not every state has gotten the message. Florida, for example, has a state law mandating that all prisoners serve a high percentage of their sentence, which is both dubious corrections policy and terrible fiscal policy.

For many years, driving up prison populations has been an easy thing for elected officials to do, popular with voters and powerful corrections officer unions. The new incarceration figures suggest, however, that in the current hard economic times, strapped states are beginning to realize that they do not have the money to keep people in prison who do not need to be there.
The last sentence reminds us of what we have been saying and bears repeating: "in the current hard economic times, strapped states are beginning to realize that they do not have the money to keep people in prison who do not need to be there." So the question is whether states want to be like Michigan with its innovative cost-saving approach or be like Florida with its budget-busting mandate that all prisoners serve a high percentage of their sentences.

Labels: , ,


Sunday, January 03, 2010

 
IT IS TIME TO CREATE A FAMILY COURT VICTIM'S COMPENSATION FUND

One of the things that interests us about the article "Back From Brazil, Seeking an Ordinary Life for a Son" is that Representative Christoper H. Smith of New Jersey, who helped Mr. Goldman get his son back, has introduced legislation to place a time limit on such court battles and to help with legal costs. We believe that legislation should also be enacted to compensate the victims of Family Court such as fathers who were wrongly incarcerated for Contempt, mothers who had their children removed from their homes after false allegations of child abuse were made, and folks who spent time in jail as a result of either accounting errors or clerical errors of the Court Administration.

Labels:


Saturday, January 02, 2010

 
"CHRISTIAN MOM" DEFIES ORDER TO RETURN CHILD TO GAY EX-PARTNER

According to the Church Report:
Lisa Miller, who was ordered by a court in Vermont to turn over her child to her former partner, has missed the 1pm EST January 1st deadline. A Vermont judge had ordered Lisa Miller to turn over daughter Isabella to Janet Jenkins at 1 p.m. Friday at the Falls Church, Va., home of Jenkins' parents.

This case has drawn worldwide attention as Miller and Janet Jenkins were lesbian partners. After a civil union ceremony in 2000, Miller was artificially inseminated and gave birth to a daughter. In 2003, the couple separated and Miller (the birthmother) renounced her homosexuality and became an evangelical Christian.

Years of court battles ensued with U.S. Supreme Court opting note to hear the case. The Virginia Supreme Court ruled in favor of Jenkins who argued that Miller had not allowed her to visit with their daughter and ignored the custody rules set down by the Vermont Family Court.

On November 20th, the Vermont court reversed a prior custody arranged ordering full custody to Jenkins. The court also ruled that on January 1st, Lisa Miller, the birth mother, must return the child over to Janet Jenkins.

Those who are interested can read more on this story at Vt. Judge: Birth Mom Must Give Child to Ex-Partner and Birth Mother Defies Order to Give Child to Ex-Partner. But our prediction is that, despite Ms. Miller's obvious contempt for the Court, she will never spend a day in jail for contempt. Our experience is that only men are incarcerated for contempt. Moreover, it would take an extremely courageous judge to enforce the Law under the facts of this case.

Labels: , ,


 

SOUTH CAROLINA DOES NOT WANT TO FOLLOW IN NEW YORK'S FOOTSTEPS

South Carolina should heed the advice presented in the Editorial "No backsliding at DJJ." As illustrated in the article "Treatment of Youths in New York Prisons Spurs Suit," violating the legal and constitutional rights of youthful prisoners invariably leads to the filing of successful class action lawsuits.


Friday, January 01, 2010

 
RE-EVALUATING THE JUDICIAL SELECTION PROCESS IN SOUTH CAROLINA

Barbara S. Williams writes in "Important constitutional issues are raised by judge's lawsuit," "It's taken more than a decade, but there's now a serious challenge to the legality of the 10-member Judicial Merit Selection Commission that decides who is qualified to serve as judges in this state." She goes on to write:
It's no secret that the Legislature passes numerous pieces of legislation that have major constitutional issues, even ignoring opinions from the attorney general's office. For the most part, the time and expense involved allows these laws to stand unchallenged, with the efforts of Greenville's citizen-watchdog, Edward Sloan, a major exception. This time, more than 10 years after the fact, it took a highly controversial decision to rouse members of the legal community to look critically at the composition of the commission (emphasis added).
We agree that there is a need for reform in South Carolina regarding the manner in which judges are selected. And we also agree that there are serious constitutional questions about the present process. What we are interested in knowing is why, if the present method is so obviously flawed, it was not challenged earlier by those who are challenging it now.

Labels: ,


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?